Disinformation is when information and ideas are spread on purpose – Brian Murphy has described the definition as having the following aspects: “a covert indirect source, intentionality that is destructive, and a political, military, or economic objective” — the intentionality is part of it. Misinformation is passed along often unwittingly out of what researchers say is often just human habit.
Sharing of misinformation is habitual, not just lazy or biased, Gizem Ceylan, Ian A. Anderson, and Wendy Wood, Edited by Susan Fiske, Princeton University; received September 28, 2022; accepted December 3, 2022, January 17, 2023 120 (4) e2216614120 Due to the reward-based learning systems on social media, users form habits of sharing information that attracts others’ attention. Once habits form, information sharing is automatically activated by cues on the platform without users considering response outcomes such as spreading misinformation. As a result of user habits, 30 to 40% of the false news shared in our research was due to the 15% most habitual news sharers.
False medical information is unfortunately very common. Habitual news sharers need to slow down and engage in critical thinking before sharing information to avoid passing on problematic or completely inaccurate information. We’ve all shared things before verifying at times. Yet most of us recognize it’s a problem.
One big problem seems to be the effect of passing on medical information that amounts to misinformation on the receiving end because it’s meant for a scientific interest audience as speculative conjecture, but then received by the actual audience as personal medical advice. And then to make matters worse, this is then used by bad actors to push products or ideas.
A Behind the Bastards podcast about William Bailey told the story of how Marie Curie went around hyping excitement about radiation — and then a bunch of grifters like William Bailey used that hype to scam people with radiation “cures” that harmed and killed people desperate for treatment for various ailments, by giving them radiation poisoning.
Unfortunately today there are even more insidious incentives for doctor pundits and scientist influencers to disregard science communication best practices and succumb to audience capture. Others actors in the information space are up to influence for financial motives.
It’s up to all of us now to keep these truths in mind when consuming media content.